[git-buildpackage] gbp.conf examples in dh_make and debmake
Andrii Kalashnykov
dr13s at outlook.com
Mon Feb 17 12:53:45 CET 2025
On Sun, 2025-02-16 at 14:41 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If people on this list would like to see dh_make and debmake add
> gbp.conf examples in new packages, feel free to +1 or comment these:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dh-make/-/merge_requests/22
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debmake/-/merge_requests/19
>
> The template I now suggest is longer to provide more support to new
> packagers. Another approach would be to make it minimal suggesting
> packagers only configure the things that are package and upstream
> specific and really needs to be there to avoid contributors having to
> guess which options to use with gbp commands.
Many upstreams do not sign their release tarballs and do not publish
the signatures. Perhaps the 'upstream-signatures' option should not be
forced on?
--
Regards, Andrii
6741 02CA 7FF7 8AE0 9567 4FE2 A0CE 7A07 38B0 83C9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.sigxcpu.org/pipermail/git-buildpackage/attachments/20250217/4f17a2b3/attachment.sig>
More information about the git-buildpackage
mailing list